Options for using Mark Ranges (Original)

TurnItIn does not allow the use of mark ranges in standards.

You can either redesign your rubric to not use mark ranges (refer Marks / Rubrics / Grading Forms Overview guide) or use one of the following workarounds:

Repeat the standard column for each mark in the range. OR
Using a grading form where the mark ranges are listed in the description.

Repeating standard columns

For the below example you could use a Standard rubric and repeat each standard column the required number of times.

Criteria	High Distinction 9-10	Credit 7-8	Pass 5-6	Fail 1-4
Argument 15% Argument and analysis (Clarity)	Rigorously argued; very high standard of critical analysis; logical structure clear and perspicuous.	Generally well argued but includes some points requiring more careful exposition or clarification.	Adequately argued but includes some careless analysis, irrelevance or vagueness.	Confusion; flawed and disorderly analysis; irrelevance, no sequiturs, incoherent argument.
Evidence 35%	Excellent and original illustrations, examples or supporting quotations.	Satisfactory examples, textual support or quotations.	Acceptable choice of illustrations, quotations and examples.	Bad, inappropriate or absence of illustrations and textual support..
Conclusion 30%	Major themes of essay are drawn together and well supported.	Generally well supported, some gaps remain.	Acceptable, some significant issues not adequately addressed.	Serious failure to provide supporting argument for central issue(s) or claims.
Scholarship 20% Scholarship and sources	Extensive research, careful and balanced selection of representative sample key points.	Standard range of references, satisfactory choice of key texts.	Acceptable range of texts and sources.	Fails to refer to recommended readings and key text or other suitable alternatives.

The above rubric could be implemented as shown:

mark ranges rubric

Refer to the Create a Standard Rubric guide for details on setting up the rubric.

Grading form

For the below example you could use a Grading form and the mark ranges listed in the title/descriptions. When marking using a Grading form you can enter a mark and comment for each criterion.

Criteria	High Distinction	Credit	Pass	Fail
Argument (10) Argument and analysis (Clarity)	9-10 Rigorously argued; very high standard of critical analysis; logical structure clear and perspicuous.	7-8 Generally well argued but includes some points requiring more careful exposition or clarification.	5-6 Adequately argued but includes some careless analysis, irrelevance or vagueness.	0-4 Confusion; flawed and disorderly analysis; irrelevance, no sequiturs, incoherent argument.
Evidence (20)	17-20 Excellent and original illustrations, examples or supporting quotations.	14-16 Satisfactory examples, textual support or quotations.	10-13 Acceptable choice of illustrations, quotations and examples.	0-9 Bad, inappropriate or absence of illustrations and textual support..
Conclusion (15)	14-15 Major themes of essay are drawn together and well supported.	11-13 Generally well supported, some gaps remain.	8-10 Acceptable, some significant issues not adequately addressed.	0-7 Serious failure to provide supporting argument for central issue(s) or claims.
Scholarship (5) Scholarship and sources	5 Extensive research, careful and balanced selection of representative sample key points.	4 Standard range of references, satisfactory choice of key texts.	3 Acceptable range of texts and sources.	0-2 Fails to refer to recommended readings and key text or other suitable alternatives.

The above rubric could be implemented as shown:

grading form screen

Refer to the Create a a Grading Form guide for details on setting up the form.